By all accounts, Urawa Reds' 3–1 defeat to Argentine giants River Plate in their FIFA Club World Cup opener in Seattle was expected. But the nature of the loss, and the commentary that followed, revealed something far more instructive than a simple scoreline. For Urawa and, by extension, Japanese football, it wasn’t just a game—they were given a sobering lesson in standards.
A Promising Start, Undone by Details
Urawa entered the tournament as AFC champions, carrying hopes not only for themselves but for an entire continent seeking greater global recognition. However, just 12 minutes into the match, they were trailing. A pinpoint switch of play from 17-year-old Franco Mastantuono—soon to be wearing Real Madrid white—found Marcos Acuña, whose first-time cross was nodded in by Facundo Colidio.
It was a move of precision and pace. Goalkeeper Shusaku Nishikawa would later remark on that moment: “The speed of the switch was different from the J.League. We were too slow to shift, and they exploited the gap between our centre-backs.”
River struck again early in the second half, this time capitalising on a critical defensive error. Norwegian centre-back Marius Høibråten misjudged a back header intended for Nishikawa, allowing Sebastián Driussi to pounce and double the lead. Though Yusuke Matsuo’s calmly converted penalty in the 58th minute offered Urawa hope, a third goal—this time a simple header from a corner by Maximiliano Meza—sealed the result.
A Game of Margins
Despite the defeat, Urawa were not overwhelmed. They registered more shots on target than River (7 to 5), and their best moments came when they played with bravery and verticality. But as many observers noted, what separated the two sides wasn’t raw ability—it was composure, decision-making, and tactical maturity.
“It wasn’t a matter of ability,” said midfielder Ryoma Watanabe. “From the moment we stepped onto the pitch, it felt like we were second-best. That’s what hurts the most.”
Brazilian journalist Luis Jorge Rodriguez, covering South American teams at the tournament, echoed that sentiment. “All three goals stemmed from centre-back issues. The difference wasn’t physical—it was experience. Urawa looked strong, but they didn’t always know how or where to play.”
Rodriguez praised the energetic runs of Takuro Kaneko and the movement of Matsuo—calling the latter “exceptional” for his positional awareness and quickness—but was less convinced by Mateus Savio, suggesting the Brazilian “didn’t seem to know what role he wanted to play.”
“We Respected Them Too Much”
Samuel Gustafson, Urawa’s Swedish midfielder, was frank in his assessment: “We were too tense, maybe respected them too much. But once we settled, we were in the game. After going 2–0 down, we reacted well, scored, and had a chance to equalise.”
Indeed, for a 15-minute period after Matsuo’s penalty, Urawa were the better side. They pressed higher, linked up with more confidence, and forced River back. But failing to capitalise on that momentum cost them. As Gustafson put it, “You don’t get many chances against sides like this—and they took theirs.”
What Was Exposed
Manager Maciej Skorza lamented the team’s poor rhythm early on. “The structure we prepared didn’t take hold in the opening phase, and that put us on the back foot,” he told DAZN post-match. “After 20 minutes we adapted, pressed higher, and created chances, but that third goal was the killer.”
And yet, it was the smallest of margins that underlined the real gulf—split-second decisions, disciplined rotations, and positional understanding. Urawa’s defenders, particularly Danilo Boza and Høibråten, struggled against the movement of River’s forwards. Watanabe admitted, “A clearance in J.League might not be a problem, but against River it turns into a chance. That’s the difference in standards.”
The loss extended Japan’s miserable run against River Plate to five defeats in five meetings. But players remained defiant. Matsuo insisted, “We were better in the second half. If we do what we always do, without overthinking, we can win. We don’t need to respect them too much.”
No Time to Dwell
The road only gets harder from here. Next up is Inter Milan—Champions League finalists and Serie A heavyweights. But that challenge is exactly what Club World Cups are meant to provide: an unfiltered look at what the world's best clubs look like.
Urawa supporters, whose volume and loyalty were widely praised in the stands, will hope their team uses the River defeat not as a reason to retreat—but as a measuring stick to elevate their performance. “We can’t keep our heads down,” said Nishikawa. “If we beat Inter, we still have a chance.”
In tournaments like this, lessons are often more valuable than wins. But with two games to go, Urawa Reds must now decide if they are here to learn—or to fight.
관련기사
- Borussia Mönchengladbach Close In on Japan Striker Shuto Machino
- Tactical Collapse: Why Ulsan's Back Three Failed at the Club World Cup
- “We Represent Asia” – Ulsan HD FC Rejects Club World Cup Scepticism
- Yokohama F. Marinos Scramble Amid Relegation Threat as They Pursue Gwangju’s Jasir Asani
- “선수 생명권이 우선”…선수협, 고온 대응 위한 ‘WBGT 기준’ 도입 촉구
- Takagi, Tawaratsumida and Komi: J1’s U23 Physical Elite Are Redefining Modern Roles
- Yokohama F. Marinos Make Official Move for Gwangju's Albanian Star Jasir Asani
- Lucas Fernandes Breaks J.League Assist Record as Cerezo Osaka Rise Again
